Line graph
The line graph gives information about dollars spent by per person of an experiment into renewable energy in Switzerland Denmark Spain and Great Britain in 25 year period from 1975.
Overall it can eventually be commented that Switzerland and Denmark experienced an upward trend; however, there was some oscillations in Spain and the UK and then, it showed a downward trend throughout the period.
Focusing on the line graph it is evident that in 1995 no one spent on research into renewable source in four countries. It is seen that Switzerland's people spent about 2 dollars for individual followed by Denmark at more than $1 Spain and UK at approximately $1 in 1980. It increased tremendously and reached $5 at the end of the period. Apart from that, from 1980 to 1990, Denmark showed a stable trend which was more than $1 per layman. Then, it reached less than $4 in 2000.
Moving further, $1 spent by spain's citizens into renewable energy in 1980. After some fluctuations, it reached at approximately all time low. In add to this, in 1985, the UK's mankind spent at half a dollar and it rose slightly to roughly $1 in 1990. Eventually, it declined to 0 Dollar per person in 2000.
- Bar graph 73
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion. 84
- . Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgive youropinion. 84
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Somepeoplesaythatcountriesandindividualsshouldprotecttheseanimals fromdyingout,whileotherssayweshouldconcentratemoreonproblemsofhumanbeings.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion. 89
- Line graph 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rall it can eventually be commented that Switzerland and Denmark experienced an u...
^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividual followed by Denmark at more than Spain and UK at approximately in 1980. ...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than Spain and UK at approximately in 1980. It increased tremendously and r...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0. It increased tremendously and reached at the end of the period. Apart from tha...
^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...howed a stable trend which was more than per layman. Then, it reached less than ...
^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... per layman. Then, it reached less than in 2000. Moving further, spent by sp...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d less than in 2000. Moving further, spent by spains citizens into renewable ...
^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a dollar and it rose slightly to roughly in 1990. Eventually, it declined to 0 Do...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.855 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74462656841 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2019386958 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2727272727 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11447498231 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444270856004 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953914635862 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080216463459 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874701892176 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.