The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
The line graph showed data that, cinema attendance in the united kingdom with the age percentage.
There are given four stages of ages on the line graph with proper years in the UK from 1990 to 2010 and the number of the per cent of age group is between 0 and 60. Cinema participants who are aged 14-24, began with 15 % in 1990 then it leapt to 17 % in 1995. When comes to 2010, the rate of attendance has increased dramatically to 21%. The individuals who are aged 24-34 commenced with 23% in 1990.
Thereon, there are fluctuations till 2005 on this year, the result went to peak in 2010 with 32 %.
Aged 34-44 people range launched 1990 with 36%. But, in 2000, the ratio fell steeply to 31%. Afterwards, in 2010, this bonus rose to 43%. Finally, aged 44-55 society began with 37% in 1990 and until 2000, the numbers continued at a reasonable rate. However, the proportion of participants peaked at 51% in 2010, intensively. We are able to see that, most attendants have detected the people who are aged 44-54.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-10 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Mubashir123 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | DannyLe | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | DannyLe | 72 | view |
| 2022-04-18 | Olimov_Olimboy12 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly to 21%. The individuals who are aged 24-34 commenced with 23% in 1990. There...
^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this percentage' or 'these percentages'?
Suggestion: this percentage; these percentages
...ll steeply to 31%. Afterwards, in 2010, these percentage rose to 43%. Finally, aged 44-55 societ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61202185792 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5299226726 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2795415923 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3333333333 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817403710562 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323743623823 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505831116704 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656441002978 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641022727454 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.