The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
The bar chart compare the quantity of cell phones and landlines per 100 individuals in seven different countries.
Overall, it is clear that Canada, US, and Denmark have the higher number of mobile phone than landlines, while the figures for other countries are completely opposite.
Among 100 people, over 60% of them in Canada have mobile phone, while the figure for landlines is just below 40%. Following closely by this, in the US, the quantity of cell phones and landlines are slighly higher than in Canada. It is notable that Denmark is the country that has the rate of citizens using mobile phones and landlines nearly equal, in range of 80 to 90 people.
In Germany, the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people are 70 and 60, respectively. People in the UK and Sweden using the these two types of communication have almost the same data, around 85 of those using mobile phones and 60 of those using landlines each. The figure of phones in Italy among 100 people is the highest, at 90, which is 2 times higher than the figure for landlines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-10 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | DannyLe | 72 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | nishchayvaid93 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | nishchayvaid93 | 44 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 89
- The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70053475936 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38768706094 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3995738602 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306712297226 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157136497475 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737128157972 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196882638274 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327091641049 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.