The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food cunsumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 yo 2000.
The graph illustrates how much pizza, humburgers, fish and chips were consumed by teenagers in Australia between 1975 and 2000. Overall, it is obvious that there were upward trends in the amount consumption of all fast food, except with pizza.
In 1975, the figure for pizza eaten was the highest, at 100 times per year, which was 10 times and 5 times higher than that for humburgers and fish and chips. Ten year latter, pizza was still the most popular type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers, with about 90 times per year. After that, from 1985 to 2000, the amount of pizza witnessed a significant decrease in the number of consumers, and finished at nearly 40 times per year in 2000.
On the other hand, humburgers, fish and chips increased dramatically from 1980 to 2000. In 2000, the amount of hamburgers consumption reached a peak for over 100 times per year, which doubled that of pizza at the same time. Meanwhile, slightly lower than that of humaburgers, the consumption of fish and chips remained stable at approximately 85 times per year during a 5-year period from 1995 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-15 | Dương Văn Biên | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food cunsumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 yo 2000. 84
- Even though globalization affects the world's economy and society in a positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss both sides. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78010471204 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54480423955 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9722079185 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175406550548 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917365926058 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403025668691 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134562438156 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392264554549 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.