The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011
The line chart illustrates the number of inquiries sent to the Tourist Information Office in a particular city via three means of communition, between January and June in 2011. It is clear that visitors to the city made more inquiries in person and via telephone, while written letters and emails became the least common choices. Additionally, the number of enquiries in person experienced the most dramatic change among the different options.
In January, the Tourist Information Office received 900 telephone enquiries, while just under 800 letters and emails were received. Not many tourists chose to ask for information in person, with just over 400 enquiries. Over the next three months, the telephone still remained the most popular method of enquiry, at approximately 1000 queries.
Meanwhile, the number of enquiries mad in person saw considerable growth to 800, surpassing the figures for emails and postal enquiries. From March to June, enquiries in person were the most common method of inquiry. By June, the number of in person enquiries soared by more than 1,000 to peak at 1,900. During this period, there was also a significant rise in the figure for telephone enquiries, from 1,000 to 1,600. By contrast, fewer people sent emails or letters to make enquiries, with slightly less than 400 enquiries in May and June.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food cunsumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 yo 2000. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18055555556 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70797718456 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9181211331 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209009974897 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806399038722 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549603598672 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144275033534 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372443272575 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.