The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The graph illustrates how the rates of the household recycling varied in three different countries over a period of 10 years. It’s obvious to see that the UK and Germany did remarkably on recycling during the period from 2005 to 2015, and the recycling rate in France declined nearly a decade before a rise afterward.
As illustrated by the graph, in France, families did great waste disposal, the household recycling rate was 50% in 2005. Comparing with France, the household recycling rates in other countries were low, UK and Germany were at 20% and 35% respectively. Afterwards, there was noticeable change, the recycling rate in France started to decline year by year; while UK and Germany increased steadily. In France, it dropped slightly and reached the low point, at 30% in 2013, then slowly returned to 40% in 2015. The household recycling rate in UK continuously went up 25% and reached 60% in 2015. Germany had a significant growth of the household recycling rate. There was a triple increase in Germany, from 20% to 60%. Similarly, during 2009 to 2011, both UK and Germany had a dramatic upward trend and rose over 15%.
According to the graph, it can be seen the biggest growth of the household recycling rate is in Germany, which is far ahead of other countries. It could speculate the household recycling rate will grows gradually in the future, which is a basic waste reduction method and easy to be formed a habit from the family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | livevanzz | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Johnysingg | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'grow'
Suggestion: grow
...ulate the household recycling rate will grows gradually in the future, which is a bas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87148594378 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68037315529 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526104417671 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2215926925 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343479159643 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139088119932 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987027741642 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250871319425 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724368712116 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.