The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts given side by side disclose how people in Europe changed their preferences for recreations over the period from 1985 to 1995.
In 1985, watching TV was obviously the most preferred pastime while Other was chosen the least favored. Interestingly, with a decade passing by, European people seemed to remain the way they spent spare time: Watching TV still ranked top and Other received the least popularity. Meanwhile, a new genre of recreation—Playing Computer Games—appeared in the survey of 1995 with a rather large portion and ranked the second favorite spare-time activity.
In the survey of 1985, the leisure activity done by the greatest portion of European residents, namely, Watching TV, accounted for 32 percent, followed by 23% for Eating Out, 21% for Talking with Friends, 18 percent for Talking with Family, and 6% for Other. Although undergoing a slight reduction of 2% in adoration ten years later, it remained at top with 30 percent in the 1995 poll while rank shift happened among other activities.
Relaxation choices categorized into Other was the least favorite, having a humble share of 6% in 1985. Likewise, in the questionnaire conducted in 1995, this group once again lay at the bottom with a decline, dropping to 2 percent. One thing noticeable is that, Playing Computer Games won Second Place with 27% as a new attraction in the Europeans’ lives.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 84
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The graph beside shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000. 73
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15720524017 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96403954184 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655021834061 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7734625798 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123460804771 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490056578085 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302489090625 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783520189532 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263295480993 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.