The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts given side by side disclose how people in Europe changed their preferences for recreations over the period from 1985 to 1995.
In 1985, watching TV was obviously the most preferred pastime while Other was chosen the least favored. Interestingly, with a decade passing by, European people seemed to remain the way they spent spare time: Watching TV still ranked top and Other received the least popularity. Meanwhile, a new genre of recreation appeared in the survey of 1995 with a rather large portion and ranked the second favorite spare-time activity.
In the survey of 1985, 32% of European residents enjoyed spending time watching TV, followed by 23% Eating Out, 21% Talking with Friends, 18 percent Talking with Family, and 6% on Other. Undergoing a slight reduction of 2% in adoration ten years later, it remained at top with 30 percent in the 1995 poll while rank shift happened among other activities.
Relaxation choices categorized into Other was the least favorite, having a humble share of 6% in 1985. Likewise, in the questionnaire conducted in 1995, this group once again lay at the bottom with a decline, dropping to 2 percent. One thing noticeable is that, Playing Computer Games as a renovate attraction occupied the lives of 27% of the Europeans.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 84
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...able is that, Playing Computer Games as a renovate attraction occupied the lives of 27% of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05140186916 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68689963425 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682242990654 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6123516452 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116503955778 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465823459699 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329550456323 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739909593639 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279921536419 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.