The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Given are two pie charts illustrating the change of entertainments the adults in Europe preferred between 1985 and 1995.
After 10 years of growth, the kinds of entertainments the adults chose were almost the same, but the proportions of different entertainments significantly changed. Watching TV in both year 1985 and year 1995 was always the first choice for the grownups, while Other was the last one that the grownups preferred. In addition, the adults were attracted by a new activity-Playing computer games in spare time in 1995 and this new recreation jumped up to the second most popular hobby of the adults.
The percentage of the most popular entertainment (as mentioned above), is 32% and 30% respectively in 1985 and 1995. 23% of adults chose eating out in spare time in 1985, whereas the rate dramatically dropped to 8% over the ten years. Talking with family was the same as Eating out, the rate had a downward trend from 18% to 7%. In contrast, 21% of adults preferred talking with friends in 1985, but the rate went up to 26% in 1995.
Other remained at the lowest level in both 1985 and 1995, the percentage appeared 6% and 2 % respectively. Despite no choice of Playing Computer Games in 1985, there were 27% off adults loved playing computer games in 1995.
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 61
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 67
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts illustrating the change ...
^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to eat'.
Suggestion: to eat
...y in 1985 and 1995. 23% of adults chose eating out in spare time in 1985, whereas the ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but the rate went up to 26% in 1995. Other remained at the lowest level in bo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84090909091 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82587065017 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2719636257 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217015877261 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920948216823 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659165555947 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151676030295 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605215749787 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.