The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Given are two pie charts illustrate the diversity of how the families in Canada spend their money in year 1972 and 2002.
It is obvious the greater parts of household expenditure in Canada were regarding Cars and Foods, however, these two items showed various changes in 1972 and 2002. The spending of Cars, Restaurants and Computers continuously increased; in the meantime, the spending of Food, Furniture, Petrol and Books dropped for the period of 30 years.
In 1972, the Canadian families took 22% spending on Cars per year; moreover, they spent up to 40% in 2002. In addition, the expenditure of Restaurants was slight increase from 8% to 14%, while the spending of the families were took 3% annually in Computers and went up over threefold to 11% in Canada between 1972 and 2002.
In contrast, there were 39% spending took on Food in Canadian families in 1972, then remarkably dropped to 14% in 2002. The categories of Furniture, Petrol and Books also were reductions from 11% to 9%, 10% to 9% and 7% to 3%, respectively from 1972 to 2002.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 67
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 84
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts illustrate the diversity...
^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...while the spending of the families were took 3% annually in Computers and went up ov...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...1% in Canada between 1972 and 2002. In contrast, there were 39% spending took ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65594769883 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8847361104 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0479585715551 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028137560137 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446195964948 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421625641034 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445914701517 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.