The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Given are two pie charts concerning the findings of a survey into the popularity of different hobbies among grown-ups in Europe in 1985 and 1995. Generally, there were both marked increases and decreases in the amount of time spent on each activity between the two milestones.
On the one hand, time that European adults spent on watching TV and talking with friends experienced negligible changes. Accounting for the most proportion of free time, watching TV remained stable, with 32% in 1985 compared with 30% in 1995. Likewise, people spent a little more time talking with their friends, with a slight rise from 21% in 1985 to 26% in 1995.
On the other hand, other pastimes, noticeably, suffered ups and downs between 1985 and 1995. If almost nobody said they spent time on playing computer games in 1985, this amusement accounted for 27% of Europeans' free time a decade later. Meanwhile, there was a remarkably drop in the amount of time spent on eating out, 23% compared with 8%, and talking with family, 18% compared with 7%, in 1985 and 1995, respectively.
Similarly, other interests also saw a decline from 6% in 1985 to 2% in 1995.
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 67
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 61
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts concerning the findings ...
^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('remarkably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...me a decade later. Meanwhile, there was a remarkably drop in the amount of time spent on eating o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88775510204 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55089795624 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0172362571 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.444444444 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211563309571 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098465559936 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941775220358 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144583085271 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960917597464 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.