The line graph illustrates how many men and women in Marysville paid for cell phone service over 20 years from 1995 to 2015.
Overall, while the number of male and female rose drastically, they rose more than men.
The number of men who subscribed cell phone service increased significantly over the period given. In 1995, about 500 male paid for cell phone service and this number noticeably reached to 2500 in 2005. From 2005 to 2010, the figure remained stable. In the last five years of the period given, we can see that a slight growth in the number of male subscription holders to about 2700 people.
Similarly, the number of women subscribing cell phone service overgrew from 1995 to 2005. By 2005, the figure hit to 2500 women and then fell smoothly to about 2100 females in 2010. There was no change in the number of women who paid for cell phone service over the last five years from 2010 to 2015.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the graph below shows the number of students enrolled in universities by gender within three years in country A 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62576687117 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22686710586 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3820194937 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14283396275 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721880048338 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564889759505 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09244570471 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035896034935 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.