The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010
The line graph delineates how much metric tons of materials were exported by a country for a decade initiating from the year 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that, the export in agricultural goods were steadily inclining from about 4 metric tons to 6 metric tons till 2003 while only 2 metric tons of other areas had been sold in abroad countries which reached to its peak 5 metric tons in 2003. After 2003, the agricultural export felt sudden drop and placed at 3 metric tons and stabilized for the next two years, similarly, other goods also declined to 4 metric tons and remained steady till 2007.
Furthermore, both the agricultural and other products possess downward trend in export, from 3 metric tons in 2006 to approximate 1 metric tons at the end of the year with some fluctuations in 2008 and from 4 metric tons in 2007 to 3 in 2008 and 2 metric tons in 2010,respectively. Interestingly, the industrial product declined to below 2 metric tons from about 2.5 metric tons in initial two years which then surged up to its peak at almost 8 metric tons at the end of the year .
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 100
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 73
- Tue diagram below shows the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at homes for the year 2019 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ost 8 metric tons at the end of the year .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64615384615 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.754100347 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1383413119 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.2 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136116289683 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109114411322 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100295166055 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149784963998 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110660444045 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.