The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010
The line graph delineates how much metric tons of materials were exported by a country for a decade initiating from the year 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that, the export in agricultural goods were steadily inclining from about 4 metric tons to 6 metric tons till 2003 while only 2 metric tons of other areas had been sold in abroad countries which reached to its peak 5 metric tons in 2003. After 2003, the agricultural export felt sudden drop and placed at 3 metric tons and stabilized for the next two years, similarly, other goods also declined to 4 metric tons and remained steady till 2007.
Furthermore, both the agricultural and other products possess downward trend in export, from 3 metric tons in 2006 to approximate 1 metric tons at the end of the year with some fluctuations in 2008 and from 4 metric tons in 2007 to 3 in 2008 and 2 metric tons in 2010,respectively. Interestingly, the industrial product declined to below 2 metric tons from about 2.5 metric tons in initial two years which then surged up to its peak at almost 8 metric tons at the end of the year .
- Tue diagram below shows the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at homes for the year 2019 78
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 100
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ost 8 metric tons at the end of the year .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64615384615 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.754100347 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1383413119 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.2 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136116289683 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109114411322 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100295166055 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149784963998 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110660444045 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.