Tue diagram below shows the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at homes for the year 2019
The bar graph elucidates the most favourable reasons why people preferred to stay home for work and the tabular data delineates the proportion of hours spend men and women for the year 2019.
Overall, it an be manifested that, saving money is the main motive behind the working from home from which males were tended to work more hours per week compured to females.
To begin with, 4% men chose to work from home while 45% decided in owing to save money which was almost double than who thinks it was more productive to work at their own place. Additionaly, 42% females work at their place to save money whereas about 26% of women did not prefer to go at workplace to care for their children.
From the another illustration, males were dominant with 81% to work over 30 hours per week while only 3% had worked less than 10 hours. In contrast 74% females spend more than 10 works for their work. 16% males and 22% female had spent about 10 to 30 hours per week in working.
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 73
- The line graph below shows the pattern of exports in a country from 2000 to 2010 100
- Tue diagram below shows the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at homes for the year 2019 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...women for the year 2019. Overall, it an be manifested that, saving money is the...
^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...women for the year 2019. Overall, it an be manifested that, saving money is the ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich males were tended to work more hours per week compured to females. To begi...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ly 3% had worked less than 10 hours. In contrast 74% females spend more than 10 works fo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50279329609 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15257131057 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1824244332 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410234043878 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193193501033 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059053020393 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246964826381 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211916005014 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.