The line graph depicts the proportion of Scotland visitors who came to different tourist attractions during a 30-year period.
Overall, the rate of Scotland’s festival tourists had witnessed the most remarkable decline. Additionally, the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited the Zoo and the Castle saw an upward trend, whereas the figure for those in the Aquarium and festival attractions plummeted during the research period.
In 1980, the rate of Scotland’s festival visitors was the highest, standing at about 30%. In contrast, the Zoo was the least popular attraction for tourists to Scotland, which registered only 10% in 1980. At the same time, the proportion of Scotland visitors who set a tour to the Aquarium and the castle was roughly 20% and 24% respectively.
From 1980 to 200 was the fluctuating period of the percentage of Scotland’s Zoo tourists, but then the figure for those experienced a gradual growth by around 10% to 20% in 2010. By contrast, the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited the festival during the research period slumped considerably, reaching the lowest point of roughly 18% in 2010. The figure for those who came to the castle saw a rapid increase from 1980 to 1990 and reached a peak of 45% in 1995. However, Scotland tourists then lose their interest in this type of attraction and the proportion for Scotland visitors to the Castle gradually fell and in 2010, it stood at around 34%. Similarly, the figure for those who visited the aquarium reached a peak in 1985 of 35% but then significantly plunged and became the least popular in 2010 of about 10%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02592592593 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80133468092 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437037037037 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3313955726 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.363636364 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189165707762 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911187546583 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602193585933 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151744196736 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539779495916 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.