The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the percentage of visitors to four sights in Scotland capital, Edinburgh between 1980 and 2010. The four attractions are Aquarium, Castle, Zoo, and Festival.
Overall, the Festival and the Aquarium had downward trends while the Castle and the Zoo saw more visitors at the end of the 30-year period than at the beginning. The slightest changes occurred in the Festival figures while the most significant fluctuations were seen in the numbers of people visiting the Aquarium.
The Aquarium and the Zoo saw similar developments until 2000, starting at 20% and 10% respectively and experiencing a series of rises and falls. From 2000 to 2010, the proportion of visitors to the Aquarium went down dramatically to about 8%, resulting in the lowest number among the four sights. Meanwhile, the Zoo figures rose sharply ending the interval at 10%.
Although having a downward trend, the Festival’s numbers decreased slightly by only about 5%, which made it the second most popular place among tourists in 2010. In contrast, Castle rose in popularity reaching a peak of almost 45% in 1995 and becoming number one attraction with just over 30% of visitors at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | ieltsyopmail | 51 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | phanhuusang | 49 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Doan Minh | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 11
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11616161616 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74541756763 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5134255892 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879477202808 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460062040675 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656628961256 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732172026146 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899755952499 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.