The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Line graph sheds light on the percentage of people visiting to Scotland's four different attractions in Edinburgh.

Aquarium, castle, zoo and Festival are the different attractions in Edinburgh. The graph represents a span of three decades starting from the year 1980 till the year 2010. The visitors at Castle peaked in the year 1995, on the contrary the Festival saw the lowest percentage of visitors the same year. There has been a downward trend in the number of people visiting to Aquarium since 1985, which reached its lowest in the year 2010. The percentage of visitors of Castle and Zoo have increased from 1980 to 2010, while the visitors of Aquarium and Festival has seen a decline.

The visitors at Castle peaked to 45 percentage of the total tourist visiting during the year 1995, after which it declined by 10 percentage in the next 5 years. The visitors to the zoo have an increase by 10 percentage in the decade starting from 2000. In 2010 the percentage of visitors who visited Castle are more than three folds than the people visiting Aquarium. The percentage of people visiting Aquarium rocketed from 20 percentage in the year 1980 to 35 percentage in the year 1985.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d by 10 percentage in the next 5 years. The visitors to the zoo have an increase by...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58797499964 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43842364532 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8444962203 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176573998153 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985726294325 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104170458107 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199451214675 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134069224912 0.0819641961636 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.