The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about how changed demographic parametres population of England between 1700 and 2000 and they are measured in population size (in millions of people) also birth and death rate (per 1000 people).
Overall, it can be seen that the size of population showed the highest trend and rate of birth and death decreased gradually during the period.
Moving to a detailed analysis, in 1700, size of population started about 3 millions people. After that, during the next 50 years, it increased sharply and reached 10 million peoples. Than the next half-century, it remained stable. From this point onwards size of population rose dramatically and by the year 2000 and stood at 50 million peoples.
On the other hand, rates of birth and death showed a gradual decrease. By 1700, each of them rates account for 30 and 27 pro mil respectively. After that each them went up over the course of 50 years and peaked 40 and 37 pro mil respectively. From the onwards, within 50 years of the period they did not change. in 1800, the rate of death and death began to decrease and amount of death stood at 20 pro mil in 2000. But rate of birth climbed up again and and reached approximately 33 pro mil at the end of the period.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 69
- Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages
- The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...sharply and reached 10 million peoples. Than the next half-century, it remained stab...
^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remained stable. From this point onwards size of population rose dramatically and...
^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...of them rates account for 30 and 27 pro mil respectively. After that each them went...
^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...se of 50 years and peaked 40 and 37 pro mil respectively. From the onwards, within ...
^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ears of the period they did not change. in 1800, the rate of death and death began...
^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...ase and amount of death stood at 20 pro mil in 2000. But rate of birth climbed up a...
^^^
Line 9, column 452, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...000. But rate of birth climbed up again and and reached approximately 33 pro mil at the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'mils'.
Suggestion: mils
...in and and reached approximately 33 pro mil at the end of the period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66818181818 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53950603644 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7152242741 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5833333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304269254942 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110682512354 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941515461835 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199194134386 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767157771802 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.