The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Submitted by taferr on Wed, 10/23/2019 - 14:09

The line graph gives information about the consumption of four different types of meat (chicken, beef, lamb, and fish) in Europa country from 1979 to 2004 and is measured in grams per person per week.

Overall, it can be seen that the overwhelming majority of consumption graphs decreased during the 25-year period, apart from chicken consumption graph.

To begin, the first year (1979), the chicken was consumption nearly 150 grams per person per week. After that, the figure increased steadily over the period and reaching at 250 in 2004.

On the other hand, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased gradually over a twenty-five years period. Namely, in 1979 beef and lamb consumption rate stood at approximately 225 and 150 respectively and end of the period (2004) they showed 100 and 60 respectively.

The consumption of fish approximately remained stable over the course of 25 years. In the year 1979, the rate of consumption of fish stood at about 60 grams and the end of the period it almost did not alter.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-22 mary.ssherr 67 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-13 manhstorm 56 view
2020-01-02 happyhappy 61 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easured in grams per person per week. Overall, it can be seen that the overwhe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apart from chicken consumption graph. To begin, the first year 1979, the chick...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e period and reaching at 250 in 2004. On the other hand, the consumption of be...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they showed 100 and 60 respectively. The consumption of fish approximately re...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, apart from, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94186046512 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74218369004 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3191776399 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254299585324 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113401956516 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675148322025 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150268426193 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614616025335 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.