The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000.
The graph provides data on the amount of Paper & packaging, sawn-wood and wood pulp produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000. It can be seen that the production of paper & packaging witnessed a significant increase, accounting for the highest yield during this period. There were clear changes in wood Pulp’s production every ten years. On the other hand, the amount of sawn-wood went down dramatically.
Analyzing more detail, the production of paper & packaging grew slightly from 230 to 250 million ton in 1990 and then increased significantly with the highest figure reached 350 million ton in the last period. The figure for wood pulp’s production declined slowly about 20 million ton between 1980 and 1990 before there was a gradual growth from that to the end of period.
In contrast, in spite of starting the high output in the beginning of period, there was a moderate drop on sawn-wood’s production from 200 to 130 million ton in 2000. It can be considered as the smallest figure compared with the other two productions in forest industry in the UK in the same period.
- With the development of online communication people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends To what extent do you agree 92
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 89
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 67
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aph provides data on the amount of Paper packaging sawnwood and wood pulp produce...
^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000 It can be seen that the production of pa...
^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be seen that the production of paper packaging witnessed a significant incre...
^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the production of paper packaging witnessed a significant increase account...
^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of sawnwood went down dramatically Analyzing more detail the production of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zing more detail the production of paper packaging grew slightly from 230 to 250...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etail the production of paper packaging grew slightly from 230 to 250 million to...
^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al growth from that to the end of period In contrast in spite of starting the hig...
^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st industry in the UK in the same period
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in contrast, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77595628415 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54030780131 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 183.0 22.4926829268 814% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 874.0 112.824112599 775% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 183.0 22.9334400587 798% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 53.0 5.23603664747 1012% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294444869173 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294444869173 0.103423049105 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197796209549 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807236419696 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 92.6 13.2329268293 700% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -97.35 61.2550243902 -159% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 72.3 10.3012195122 702% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.56 8.06136585366 193% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 75.2 10.9970731707 684% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aph provides data on the amount of Paper packaging sawnwood and wood pulp produce...
^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000 It can be seen that the production of pa...
^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be seen that the production of paper packaging witnessed a significant incre...
^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the production of paper packaging witnessed a significant increase account...
^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount of sawnwood went down dramatically Analyzing more detail the production of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zing more detail the production of paper packaging grew slightly from 230 to 250...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etail the production of paper packaging grew slightly from 230 to 250 million to...
^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al growth from that to the end of period In contrast in spite of starting the hig...
^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st industry in the UK in the same period
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in contrast, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77595628415 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54030780131 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 183.0 22.4926829268 814% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 874.0 112.824112599 775% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 183.0 22.9334400587 798% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 53.0 5.23603664747 1012% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294444869173 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.294444869173 0.103423049105 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197796209549 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807236419696 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 92.6 13.2329268293 700% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -97.35 61.2550243902 -159% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 72.3 10.3012195122 702% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.56 8.06136585366 193% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 75.2 10.9970731707 684% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 11.0658536585 840% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.