The line graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport

The graph below compared the amount of goods carried by four catergories of modes of transport
In the UK from 1974 to 2002.

It is clear that the total amount of goods in the UK increased over the period, but the figured for the road was the highest.

In 1974 the merchandise transported by the road was about 70 million tonnes, which was much higher than that of water and rail, at about 40 million tonnes. Just over 5 million tones came from pipeline. From 1974 to 1994, the figures for the road and rail fluctuated and both dipped in 1994, at nearly 80 and 30 million tonnes respectively. Over the same period, the water and pipeline increased gradually.

Throughout the remainder of the period, there was a dramatic increase in the amount of merchandise transported by the road, water and rail , at nearly 100, 65 and about 40 million tonnes in respective. While the figures for the pipeline remained unchanged, at about 22 million tonnes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-12 nobitaa 73 view
2024-07-12 nobitaa 73 view
2024-06-21 unstoppable 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same period, the water and pipeline increased gradually. Throughout the r...
^^
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... transported by the road, water and rail , at nearly 100, 65 and about 40 million ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75903614458 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55094037243 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4642957917 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168941833867 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907833430158 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154653397444 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158666777567 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130947697465 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.