The line graph depicts the proportion of tourists to England who visited Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier, and Festival between 1980 to 2010.
The line graph depicts the proportion of tourists to England who visited Art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier, and Festival between 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the number of visitors to Art Gallery and Festival experienced a downward trend, while the tourists visits to Pavilion and Pier increased in the recorded time.
The percentage of tourists visiting Art Gallery peaked at just above 35% in 1985, followed by a dramatic decrease to just below 20% in 1990, then the figure gradually decreased close to 8% in 2010. The trend for Art Gallery and Pavilion were similar. The number of tourists visiting Pavilion started marginally below 25% and peaked at just above 45% in 1995, after a steady decline to just above 30% in 2010.
The figures for Pier hovered at around 10% to just about 15% until 2005, finally reaching slightly above 20% in 2005. The tourists visiting the Festival began at around 30% and gradually decreased to 25% in 1995, after a slight increase in 2000 the figure stayed relatively stable for next 10 years with just below 30%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-23 | SaranyaJeevesh | 73 | view |
2019-03-22 | SaranyaJeevesh | 73 | view |
- Although riding bicycle brings enormous health and environment benefits, the time taken to travel is more compared to other forms of transports 61
- The table illustrates the data about the forest area in millions of hectares in six different continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005. 73
- non-traditional subjects such as music, art and acting should be considered as equally as other traditional subjects in primary schools. 61
- Take a look at the graphic and complete the task.The table and chart show data from a survey of library users.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The line graph depicts the number of burglaries per thousand in Great Britain, Greece, Spain, and Norway from 2000 to 2009. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... Art Gallery and Pavilion were similar. The number of tourists visiting Pavilion st...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y decline to just above 30% in 2010. The figures for Pier hovered at around 10% ...
^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly reaching slightly above 20% in 2005. The tourists visiting the Festival began at...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92655367232 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39217339178 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8134128564 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389899205202 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236409316097 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.31647550566 0.0843802449381 375% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361873144674 0.15604864568 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.372502806221 0.0819641961636 454% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.