The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007, in grams
The line graph depicts the number of grams' spreads used between 1981 and 2007. At first glance, it is evident that the amount of three spread kinds decreased by 2007.
It can be seen from the chart that the most popular spread in 1981 was butter, reaching at just over 140 grams, then growing to 160 grams in 1989. In contrast, consumption of margarine was about 90 grams in 1981, which was lower than butter. This figure continued to fell to 80 grams in 1986. However, in 1991, the amount of butter consumed significantly dropped by 60 grams, at 100 grams. This number was as same as the figure for margarine.
In 1996, low fat and reduced spreads appeared firstly and the amount of consumption of low fat and reduced spreads considerably increased over a period of 5 years, reaching a peak at approximately 80 grams in 2001. By 2007, there was a gradual decrease in both three kinds of spread. Only have 40 grams of low fat and reduced spreads used, while the figures for butter and margarine were about 50 grams and 70 grams respectively.
- The chart shows ways that schoolchildren get to school in three different countries 79
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 61
- In some countries people are forced to retire when they reach a certain age What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 70
- The bar chart below show British emigration from 2004 to 2007 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58288770053 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4647707975 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5592421687 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359441609991 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141515223817 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108257073147 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268668337091 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110701711592 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.