The line graph illustrates the number of international travelers in five distinct countries (Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France, and the USA) during the 15-year period from 1995.
The line diagram depicts the millions number of foreigner are travelling to 5 major country since 1995 to 2010.
Overall,it is clearly show travelling trend are risen in 15 year time duration.when usa Peoples gain frist place to travelling to foreign country compare to another 4 nation it is 71% to 89% in 1995 to 2010.while egypt and brazil human begins travelling data are same in 1995.in addition,in 2010,the egypt people are slight risen compare to Brazilians,it is 15% and 21% respectively.
Furthermore,surpricesly,France nation graph rocketry fire 30% to 60% in only 5 year duration perioud since 1995 to 2010.after that graph slightly increase to only 8% in 2005.moreover 2005 to 2010, treand are also risen 68% to 90% in 2010.secondly travelling trend are less poupolar in Malesia it is 20% to 40% in all over 15 year time perioud.
In conclusion,the travelling treand are most popular in France and usa coamper to 3 another countery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-07 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 78
- Many people believed that reducing speed limits is the best option for road safety improvement.Do you think there are other measure that could be put in place ? 61
- A country become more interesting and develops more quickly when it is population includes a mixture of nationalities. 78
- Computer are an essential feature of modern education.Some people believe that certain subjects,such as mathematics,are better taught using computers.Other,however,think that there are aspects of education in which computer use is inadequate. 61
- The line graph illustrates the number of international travelers in five distinct countries (Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France, and the USA) during the 15-year period from 1995. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...jor country since 1995 to 2010. Overall,it is clearly show travelling trend are ri...
^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'showed', 'shown'.
Suggestion: showed; shown
...ce 1995 to 2010. Overall,it is clearly show travelling trend are risen in 15 year t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...elling data are same in 1995.in addition,in 2010,the egypt people are slight risen ...
^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...e are slight risen compare to Brazilians,it is 15% and 21% respectively. Furthe...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilians,it is 15% and 21% respectively. Furthermore,surpricesly,France nation gr...
^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , surpricesly
...5% and 21% respectively. Furthermore,surpricesly,France nation graph rocketry fire 30% t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 40% in all over 15 year time perioud. In conclusion,the travelling treand are ...
^^^
Line 4, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... 15 year time perioud. In conclusion,the travelling treand are most popular in F...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54980067224 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608974358974 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.324205004 43.030603864 301% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.0 112.824112599 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25130773958 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147567232164 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560914973603 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147567232164 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560914973603 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.2329268293 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.