The line graph reveals information on the amount of three kinds of spread (margarine, low fat and reduced spreads and butter) which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007.
The line graph reveals information on the amount of three kinds of spread (margarine, low fat and reduced spreads and butter) which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007. Units are measured in grams.
From an overall perspective, one of the most outstanding features is that there was a fluctuation in the consumption of margarine and low fat & reduced spreads between 1981 and 2007, whereas there was a downward trend in the consumption of butter at the same time. By the year 1981, the figure given for butter appeared to be by far the highest one among the three chosen spreads, with over 140 grams which was followed by a similar figure recorded for margarine, with about 90 grams. The consumption of low fats and reduced spreads do not appear in 1981.
It is interesting to note that the number of butter was slight growth between 1981 and 1986, from 140 grams to 160 grams. But it decreased dramatically during the years 1986 - 1996, from about 160 grams to almost 70 grams then continued its downward trend roughly 50 grams by the year 2007. Similarly, after fluctuated slightly between 1986 and 1996, the quantity of margarine dropped significantly to 40 grams by the year 2007.
Surprisingly, the consumption of low fats and reduces spreads only started in 1996 at about 10 grams. Then, it increased dramatically between 1996 and 2001, with about 85 grams - an exponential growth of almost 8 times. The years 2001 - 2007 experienced a drop slightly the number of low fat & reduced spreads, from 80 grams to 70 grams - stood at the highest one.
- the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia 78
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of france 78
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- reasons of choosing a university 60
- ELECTRONIC GOODS AND SERVICES BY AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80669144981 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6201104008 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494423791822 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.939167797 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438117945882 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190809753618 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.245540266133 0.0843802449381 291% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349503960748 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.286673290211 0.0819641961636 350% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.