the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

Essay topics:

the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The bar graph reveals information on the amount of money spent on five selected consumer goods (Cars, Computers, Books, Perfume and Cameras) in France and the UK in the year 2010. Units are measured in thousands of pounds sterling.
From an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the two countries spent on cameras. Actually, the figure given for people both two countries spent on cars appeared to be the largest one among the five selected groups, with over £400 thousand in France and £450 thousand in UK. Nevertheless, the number of perfume was found to be the lowest one, with under £200 thousand.

Surprisingly, the figure given for the UK was significantly higher than that of France in the majority of consumer goods, excepting for computersand perfumer. The figure given for computer people in France spent about £370 thousand and people in UK spent 350 thousand. Similarly, the number of perfume in France was found to be £200 thousand being significantly over higher than that in the UK £145

It is interesting to note that the number of people spent on cameras in UK was great higher two times than that in France. Actually, these figures were found to be £350 thousand and £150 thousand, respectively. The UK expenditure on Book over £400 thousand, whereas people in France spent only £300 thousand

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 67 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 78 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 61 view
2024-09-24 Sheikh Sajib view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople in France spent only £300 thousand
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, nevertheless, similarly, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04910714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70645825659 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7826505017 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891479146926 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423434342546 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453667199903 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067369875036 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368054960307 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.