The line graph shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates the consumption of Margarine, Lowfat and reduced, and Butter spreads over 25 years from 1981 to 2007. The units are measured in Grams.
Overall, In 1981, Butter spreads consumption is the highest, whereas, Margarine spreads consumption is the lowest. Lowfat and reduced Spreads introduced in 1996 had the highest consumption by 2007 while Margarine spreads were the least consumed.
To begin, Butter spreads started at an overwhelming 140 grams in 1981. This figure raised steadily to reach a peak of 160 grams by 1986. From this point, the graph drastically plummeted down over the years finally reaching 50 grams by 2007. As for Margarine spreads, the graph started at 90 grams which saw a downward trend till 1986 and an upward trend for the next five years. This number remained stable till 1996 and then decreased steadily to 40 grams by the final year.
In terms of Lowfat and reduced spreads, the graph started at 10 grams which gradually rose to just over 80 grams by 2001. This figure then dropped to 70 grams in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | priynnk1663 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 73
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, then, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89444444444 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45361914599 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6049726518 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0909090909 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297623931303 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122123642067 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134144378608 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216200089844 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133159796116 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.