The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts give information about the average expenses of a family in a county in two different years (1950 and 2010). The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, Housing was the major expense for an average household in 1950 whereas Food became the largest in 2010. Healthcare accounted for the smallest expense in both years.
Housing comprised 72.1% of the budget in 1950 which plummeted dramatically by 50% to 22% in 2010. Food, on the other hand, made up 11.2% of the entire budget in 1950 showed a significant increment by approximately 20% to 34% in 2010. The proportion of expense on Healthcare which was 2.4% in 1950 remained the least with a mere increment of around 2% to 4.5%.
Transportation costs and Other costs incurred in 1950 rose massively reaching 14% and 19.2% in 2010. In contrast, the percentage of money spent on Education which was 6.6%, decreased by a mere 0.3% reaching 6.3% in 2010.
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 70
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours. What causes this situations? How to solve it 11
- It is thought by some that its better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the country side.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 56
- It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by a mere 0.3% reaching 6.3% in 2010.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84810126582 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76518545506 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1919783313 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302601991047 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10871228442 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102903881071 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175738116163 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778982704833 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.