The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many people used cell phones categorized by gender in Marysville during the period from 1995 to 2015.
It is clear that there was an upward tendency in the number of male and female users subscribed to cell phones throughout the years. Besides, the figures for both men and women witnessed the most significant rise within the first decade.
As can be seen, 500 men were using mobile phones in 1995. Over the next 10 years, the sum of those kept increasing considerably and reached a high of 2500 subscribers. However, stability was experienced by male users until 2010 before peaking at 2725 in 2015.
Likewise, more than 500 females owned phones at the beginning of the observed time, then it soared noticeably to the same peak as males in 2005. Nevertheless, the total of those decreased slightly to 2225 million in 2010 and stayed unchanged within the following 5 years.
Generally, while the numbers of both male and female subscribers rose considerably, they rose more for men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view |
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97093023256 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64403238391 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68023255814 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.899799196 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11810331856 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467371444354 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578634708504 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707705042689 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052136373904 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.