The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people. Do you agree or disagree?
Recent years have witnessed that the most effective method for authority to build up a better future is by allocating its resources for the young. From my perspective, I completely agree with this view because of the tremendous benefits.
To begin with, it is vital to recognize that young people enhance motivation behind a country's development. When a nation directs its resources towards its young generation by investing in education, healthcare, and social programs that kicks off the younger with the skills and knowledge required. Consequently, the government would produce the high-quality workforce for its growth. In addition, the young people would play pivotal role as governor of country so the learning environment invested for them would create faithful leaders to lead in an ever-evolving world. For example, in developed countries, those leaders who graduated from high-value universities are less corrupt and more positive thinkers and contribute excellence.
Furthermore, investing in young people promotes social cohesion and stability. By providing quality education and accessible healthcare, a nation ensures that its youth are healthier, better informed, and less tend to engage in criminal activities or extremist ideologies. As a result, there would be lower crime rates, stronger community bonds, and a more harmonious society. In addition, this investment ensures that the workforce remains competitive, capable of contributing to technological advancements and adapting to the changing economic landscape. Countries like Finland exemplify the success of such an initiative, as it has led to their exceptional educational outcomes and a competitive edge in the global economy.
Overall, investing in young people not only secures a nation's economic future but also fosters social harmony. Therefore, it is imperative for countries to prioritize the allocation of resources towards the development and well-being of their young population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orkforce remains competitive, capable of contributing to technological advancemen...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...esting in young people not only secures a nations economic future but also fosters social...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9823943662 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29745014291 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647887323944 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2117478793 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311935981447 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996189520987 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671473554005 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196768820494 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639563406333 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.