This line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information.
The chart shows the percentage of employed women in four countries in an interval of twenty years. Information is described for the USA, Korea, Afghanistan, and France.
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of working women in the USA went up steadily between the year 1985 to 2000 until it was followed by a slight drop by 2005. In Korea, the percentage of working women gradually climbed up as well, but with no decrease. The data on the rate of women employed in Afghanistan shows a different trend. For 10 years from 1985 to 1995, there was about 33 percent of women working, and the rate rose moderately until 1995. After 1995, however, this rate dropped dramatically to about 10 percent and it continued to go down further by 2005. In the case of France, the percentage of employed women fell slightly in the first five years of the period shown, then followed by a swift growth of approximately 20 percent.
In conclusion, the rate of working women in all countries described in the provided line chart is higher than in 1985 except for Afghanistan. Among other countries, the USA and France are the only ones where the majority of women were employed in 2005.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-27 | HanhDao1911 | 87 | view |
- This line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information 87
- The graph below shows that the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2000 78
- The graph belows shows that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities
- The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, then, well, except for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60674034558 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6905031129 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331388751364 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133081781344 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554387697374 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250360586133 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431448115185 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.