The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005

This chart shows the percentage of women em-
ployed in four countries over an interval of twenty
years. Information is shown for the USA, Korea,
Afghanistan and France from 1985 to 2005.
It can be seen in the graph that the percentage
of working women in the USA went up steadily
between the year of 1985 and 2000, until it was
followed by a slight decrease by 2005. The
percentage of working women in Korea shows
a steady increase as well, but with no decrease.
The data on the rate of women employed in
Afghanistan shows a different trend. There were
about 33 percent of women working in 1985 and
the rate rose moderately until 1995. However, for
some reason, the rate dropped dramatically from
1995 to 2000 to 10 percent and it continued to
drop by 2005. In the case of France, there was a
sudden decrease of around 10 percent from 1985
to 1990, which was followed by a swift growth
of approximately 20 percent between 1990 and
1995. The rate of women employed in France then
stabilized until 2005.
In conclusion, the rates of working women in all
countries are higher in 2005 than those in 1985 with
an exception of Afghanistan. Out of four countries,
the USA and France are the countries where the
majority of women are employed in the year 2005.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our countries over an interval of twenty years. Information is shown for the USA,...
^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Information is shown for the USA, Korea, Afghanistan and France from 1985 to 2005...
^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be seen in the graph that the percentage of working women in the USA went up stea...
^^^
Line 6, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orking women in the USA went up steadily between the year of 1985 and 2000, until...
^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the year of 1985 and 2000, until it was followed by a slight decrease by 2005. T...
^^^
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llowed by a slight decrease by 2005. The percentage of working women in Korea sho...
^^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentage of working women in Korea shows a steady increase as well, but with no d...
^^^
Line 11, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he data on the rate of women employed in Afghanistan shows a different trend. The...
^^^
Line 12, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stan shows a different trend. There were about 33 percent of women working in 198...
^^^
Line 13, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 33 percent of women working in 1985 and the rate rose moderately until 1995. How...
^^^
Line 14, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rose moderately until 1995. However, for some reason, the rate dropped dramatical...
^^^
Line 15, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ason, the rate dropped dramatically from 1995 to 2000 to 10 percent and it contin...
^^^
Line 16, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 2000 to 10 percent and it continued to drop by 2005. In the case of France, the...
^^^
Line 17, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2005. In the case of France, there was a sudden decrease of around 10 percent fro...
^^^
Line 18, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decrease of around 10 percent from 1985 to 1990, which was followed by a swift g...
^^^
Line 19, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...90, which was followed by a swift growth of approximately 20 percent between 1990...
^^^
Line 20, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pproximately 20 percent between 1990 and 1995. The rate of women employed in Fran...
^^^
Line 21, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he rate of women employed in France then stabilized until 2005. In conclusion, ...
^^^
Line 23, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usion, the rates of working women in all countries are higher in 2005 than those ...
^^^
Line 24, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e higher in 2005 than those in 1985 with an exception of Afghanistan. Out of four...
^^^
Line 25, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of Afghanistan. Out of four countries, the USA and France are the countries whe...
^^^
Line 26, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...A and France are the countries where the majority of women are employed in the ye...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74449339207 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50874772212 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488986784141 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7827631346 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 27.0 3.83414634146 704% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 22.0 1.69756097561 1296% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40164380692 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158962966708 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055202254141 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999292187051 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767037750809 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.