The line paragraphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010.
The first line graph compares the steel production and the demand in the UK in 2010 while the second one reveals the employee number in the industry in the same year. Overall, the production of steel was higher throughout the year than that of the demand except in December and the highest number of employees was employed in this industry at the beginning of the year.
According to the first graph, the UK produced 400 million tonnes steel in January and at that time demand was exactly the half of that. After the first quarter, the production and needs for steel remained almost the same. At the end of the second quarter, August, the UK’s steel production stool at just over three thousand million tonnes against a million tonnes less demand. From January till November, the production was higher than the demand and the gap between these two was on average a million tonne. However, the scenario shifted dramatically at the end of the year. From September till November, the steel production plummeted and so did the demand. In December, the demand for steel exceeded the total production.
The second line graph reveals that five million employees worked in the steel industry and this number dropped to two million less in April. From that time onward, the employee number showed some fluctuations and in August, the UK steel sector employed around 3.5 million workers. This number continuously dropped throughout the rest of the year and declined to one million in December.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | mybinh2005 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | stanie calitex | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- Nowadays most countries improve the standard of living through economic development But some social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages 76
- The maps below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. 78
- The line paragraphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010. 84
- Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94820717131 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43117350133 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422310756972 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0659192302 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465610017847 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183661524238 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871899111853 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320523628477 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138510893409 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.