The pie charts give information about the average food of different types being consumed in the world in comparison with that in two nations being China and India.
The pie charts give information about the average food of different types being consumed in the world in comparison with that in two nations being China and India.
Generally, people all over the world filled their stomach mainly with processed food. In addition, Chinese and Indian people ate nuts and seeds by far more than residents in the rest of the world did.
Regarding processed food and vegetables, instant food was the major source of energy for the world population, accounting for 41%, which was the highest number achieved by any other food sorts in any other regions. India followed closely at 39%, while 34% is the figure for China. Vegetables and fruits provided approximately one-third of dietary requirements for Chinese as well as the whole world’s citizens and precisely 23% for Indians.
Interestingly, nuts and seeds was generally the least contributor to the diet of people all over the world at a minute 4% while it made up a noticeably higher rate, at almost one-fifth in food stocks of the Chinese and just above 11% in that of the Indian. Food deprived from animals supplied more than a quarter of Indian dietary provisions, which was 12% higher than that of China and almost the same of the world’s food demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-21 | rika_lavarose | 84 | view |
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; CHina and India. Write a report to describe this data 78
- Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers, rather to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The maps below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. 67
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006, 2007 and 2014 89
- Some groups of people have benefit from modern communication technology but some people have not benefit at all to what extent do you agree or disagree 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, third, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95260663507 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63449992105 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2951075959 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348929732939 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18054143237 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.31095810926 0.0843802449381 369% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315236874445 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.395352647697 0.0819641961636 482% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.