Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparison where relevant

The maps illustrate the transformation of the town of Harborne from 1936 to 2007. Overall, as can be clearly seen, Harborne turned from a small undeveloped agricultural town to a thriving modern developed one.

In 1936, Harborne had only a few structures. In addition to two terraces of public facilities in the central area, there existed only a building of Government Offices in the south-east, near a huge farmland. Apart from that, the landscape was mostly barren, with some trees in the north-west, a river in the north-east and a winding cycle path in the south-west.

However, by 2007, many changes had occurred, making the town become much more convenient with many amenities. First of all, in the north-west, trees had been chopped down by two-thirds, the small cycle path in the south-west was widened to a curved beautiful road. Moreover, in the central area, a new shopping centre was erected in the middle, surrounded by other public facilities. While the post office, the bank and the library were kept unchanged, the flower shop was converted to a travel agent, the sweet shop and butchers were merged into a new supermarket. Other notable developments included a modern residential area built by the old river, a golf course replacing the farmland next to the museum that used to be the government offices.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l area, there existed only a building of Government Offices in the south-east, ne...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, third, while, apart from, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02262443439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86094538518 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597285067873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2132680564 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119335532967 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636076134703 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934653546716 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10286375917 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826271654526 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.