Many different countries have most shops and products the same. Some consider it a positive development, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In times of globalization nowadays, it is a common sight that there is an increasing ubiquity in the selections of products and shops in different parts of the world. While it is perceived as harmful by some people, others advocate this trend. This essay discusses both of these views in greater detail, before justifying my disapproval of having the same shops and products in various countries.
On the one hand, this development may do wonders for the experience of consumers. It stands to reason that many customers only stick to one brand of product for their whole life, so this trend obviously paves the way for convenience and consistent experience while they are in other countries. For example, people, when traveling abroad, can go to major convenient stores and seek their basic necessities that they would expect in their home countries. Since these products are globally distributed, the quality of products is still guaranteed as they all undergo the same manufacturing process, safety standards, and provisions. Therefore, shoppers can still enjoy their preferable products without being concerned about the product quality.
Despite the benefit of having the same shops and productions in many countries that is aforementioned, I am inclined towards the idea that the upside of this phenomenon is eclipsed by its downside for two main reasons. First and foremost, this may induce toxic and powerful monopolies of many corporations worldwide. Without a doubt, should the products of some companies prevail all around the world, these products may dominate and wreak havoc on other businesses. As a result, some enterprises may go bankrupt as their products are not exported due to the dominance of other products. Meanwhile, if the adoption of many products and shops is only limited to some nations, other companies will not have to suffer economic difficulties. They, consequently, stand a great chance of competing with one another, facilitating the economy of a certain country. Another drawback of this trend is that it may worsen the experience of foreign tourists when they visit other nations. Take, for example, Mixue, which is an omnipresent brand of ice cream. In Vietnam as well as other countries, various mixue shops are constructed every few months, so people can run into those shops in one way or another, no matter how they try to avoid these shops. This, in turn, frustrates and irritates foreigners in Vietnam as they are forced to have Mixue ice cream, which they already had in their home countries tons of times, instead of other choices. Meanwhile, if some products are not circulated widely, it allows others, especially tourists, to try new experiences in other countries.
In conclusion, disseminating the same products and shops globally has its own pros and cons. However, its merits pale in comparison with its demerits. Hence, I hold the firm belief that it is wiser for all businesses to spread their products to only a few countries rather than distributing them all over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | An Hai Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Some people say that what individuals protect the environment cannot make a difference Other people say that every individual should take responsibility for it Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 73
- Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... major convenient stores and seek their basic necessities that they would expect in their home co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 5.60731707317 838% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 965.302439024 264% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 494.0 196.424390244 251% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16396761134 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 3.73543355544 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8228561671 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 106.607317073 244% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 283.868780488 275% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5884618214 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.954545455 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217430227995 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691226902585 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515036203533 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139264458744 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578161985334 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 40.7170731707 312% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.