Map
The two maps describe how road access to a city hospital changed from 2007 to 2010. During the course of three-year period, the most significant improvement lies on the car park extension in order to provide more parking space for the customers.
This city hospital was not located by the main road so a hospital road existed to connect City Road and the hospital, with a ring road surrounding the building. In 2007, the position of car park was between the hospital and main road, on the left and right side of hospital road. Both hospital staffs and public visitors could park their vehicle in this area.
After three years, the car park field had not only changed but also extended from one location to three locations. Furthermore, two roundabouts had been added at the beginning and at the end of hospital road. In the eastern part of hospital road lied a car park for only staff that was previously functioned for the customers too. Buses could park in the space across staff car park and this bus station had linking roads to the roundabouts. At the upper-right corner of the 2010 map, there has been added parking area only for patients and visitors next to the city hospital, allowing more convenience for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'During'.
Suggestion: During
...ity hospital changed from 2007 to 2010. During the course of three-year period, the most significant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72429906542 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44304946693 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1334225552 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634475932745 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035650884364 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726801520506 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608032956194 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509971237143 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.