The map above shows the changes that have taken place in meadowside villages, and Fonton, a neighboring town, since 1962
The map illustrates the developments that have occured between meadowside village and Fonton from 1962 to the present.
As can be seen from the graph, both places had expanded and developed, such as the addition of residential housing, commercial housing and infrastructure. Additionally, the lands were merged into one large area.
In 1962, Meeadowside village was completely separated from Fonton. A main road ran through Meadow village from the southwest to the northwest and Fonton aslo had a rail line crossing over it from the southeast to northeast.
By 1985, the village had changed significantly. A new road was constructed that connected the village to Fonton. Following that, many commercial housing structures were built along the main road as a leisure complex, a super-store and a housing estate, which all appeared at the western side of the Village.
At present, Meadowside village and Fonton have been merged. An empty area between them was turned into a business park. A hotel and a station have also built next to the road with the new line connecting to the old one. Moreover, Meadowside village has been converted into meadow suburbs of Fonton.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-21 | peterlinguini | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- The pie chart below show the rate of online shopping sales for retail sector in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 78
- The map above shows the changes that have taken place in meadowside villages and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 84
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86122225592 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5901157853 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239681730341 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10473982723 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955487413394 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144960572114 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929945699666 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.