The map below shows a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and now.
The illustrations depict information regarding how an Australian beachfront area has transformed, comparing 1950 and the present. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that this location has experienced relatively extensive transformations and modifications, the most noticeable of which is the extension of the main road and the addition of new recreational facilities.
Regarding the upper part of the area, a cityward road has been expanded to the south, encircling the location and leading to a lighthouse. While a northern playground has been demolished to make way for an additional car park, dining tables, and a pavilion, situated contiguous to the road, have remained unaltered.
Concerning the lower part of the area, to the west, an additional restaurant and a surf club have been erected in the place which was formerly a vacant space. Moreover, adjacent to those newly-established buildings, a 25-meter swimming pool has doubled in length. To the east, a surf club has been constructed, sandwiching the remaining 25-meter pool and the lighthouse which have maintained the status quo throughout the day.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age group who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction between many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34256897415 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605714285714 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2086887757 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723882607439 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386383233623 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595730510883 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496738446043 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327778016117 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.06136585366 129% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.