The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Both maps depict a seaside village, before and after it was extended for tourism.
Since 1995 to present, the village has seen spectacular developments, it has a lot of resources to entertain the visitors and, besides, contact with sea in the south. Over the period, the village was developed with the addition of housing, restaurants, car park and courts.
The most noticeable additions are several new apartments. 4 housings have been built in the northwest of the village, fish market in the south has been knocked-down for 4 more extra apartments. The shops in front of the fish market has been reconstructed into restaurants. The hotel has been extended with car park. The farmland has been converted into a golf field and forest park have been cut down for tennis courts in the northeast.
A fishing port has been demolished but new beaches haven’t been created instead. As for the trees, there are no more plants in the village.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and after it was extended for tourism. Since 1995 to present, the village has s...
^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... hotel has been extended with car park. The farmland has been converted into a golf...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, so, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95597484277 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77045274449 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8043475693 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0497988370465 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200303439494 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331028692284 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0372923843466 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460799148024 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.