The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map compares two potential locations for a new supermarket in a town of Garlsdon.
It is clear from the map that the first site is outside the town, which the second site is in the town center. Additionally, we can see that the position of both sites relative to a railway and three roads which lead to three smaller towns.
The most noticeable point from the map is that S1 is in the countryside and it lies 12 kilometers to the northwest of the town. This site is also good for local residents of Garlsdon and Hindon. S2 which is right in the center of Garlsdon and it is also close to the residential area.
In addition, there are three main roads to Garlsdon town center from Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon. However, the central area is a no traffic zone, so parking would be a problem in S2. By contrast, S1 lies on the main road to Hindon, it would be more difficult to arrive from Bransdon and Cransdon. Both locations are close to the railway which links between Hindon and Cransdon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions 86
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 85
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45355191257 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48558806897 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9138143006 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293315505242 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1300241665 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168755595754 0.0843802449381 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247235117715 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196043700993 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.