The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The charts compare between 1995 and 2005 in term of various types of energy production in France.
Overall, Gas and Coal were the main energy products of France in 1995 and in 2005. Moreover, proportion of Gas, Coal and Petrol in both years was slightly similar.
Coal production between 1995 and 2005 accounts for the largest percentage (29,80 % and 30,93 %, respectively). Although, the figure of Gas in both years was also the second biggest after the figure of Coal, Gas production in 2005 was bigger than in 1995 ( 30,31% and 29,63%, respectively). In contrast, the proportion of Petrol was produced in 1995 1,72% significant more than their counterparts in 2005.
Nuclear and other energy production between 1995 and 2005 were the two lowest percentages. However, the proportion of Nuclear production in 2005 was larger than in 1995 (10,10% and 6,40%, respectively). Likewise, the figure of other energy production in 2005 was (4,20%) more than their counterparts in 1995.
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The graph shows weekly expenditure on fast food in Britain by food and income group. 56
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oduction in 2005 was bigger than in 1995 30,31% and 29,63%, respectively. In cont...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1835443038 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74851522417 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449367088608 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0230811267 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297631935418 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166374979667 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968859435348 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223433826211 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568616982522 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.