The map shows changes between 1960 and now in the Station street

Essay topics:

The map shows changes between 1960 and now in the Station street

The two pictures compare the layouts of the Station street in two periods, namely 1960 and the present time. It is clear that there are considerable changes in the layout of this street over the period shown. The main modifications have included the removal of many local shops and the addition of a supermarket and a car park.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1960 there was a fish and chips in the northeast corner of the street, opposite a dry cleaner's. At present, however, this shop has been replaced by a cafe. In addition, many shops along the north side of the street including a book store, a toy, a bakery, and a DVD Rental store have been demolished to make way for a supermarket. The two maps also show that the pharmacy and the butcher in the top left corner of the street have been knocked down, creating space for a new car park. Furthermore, the grocery store in the bottom left has been turned into a hotel. The public telephone next to the grocery has also been removed in order to expand the railway station. Finally, The dry cleaner's in the southeast corner has remained

Votes
Average: 6.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-13 lethianhthu 73 view
2023-07-01 mylinh3001 73 view
2023-06-09 hanbnguyenle 78 view
2022-12-21 NajlaM view
2022-11-03 Jamjam23 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'cleaner'?
Suggestion: cleaner
...st corner of the street, opposite a dry cleaners. At present, however, this shop has bee...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he street including a book store, a toy, a bakery, and a DVD Rental store have be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48039215686 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42011943617 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3525099558 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200562979279 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682895177778 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671593475521 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162442351806 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105276724854 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.