The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962

Essay topics:

The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton, a neighboring town , since 1962

The maps provide a broad outline of the expansion of a village called Meadowside and a town called Fonton over three eras of time: 1962, 1985, and the present day. Overall, both areas experienced significant growth, and by the end of the era Meadowside had been absorbed into Fonton and was now referred to as the suburb of Meadowside.

In 1962, Meadowside and Fonton were separated by a strip of empty land with no transport links between them. Access to Meadowside was provided by a road running through the village from the southwest to the northeast, while Fonton was serviced by a railway that passed through the town from the southeast to the northwest.

Just over two decades later, the two areas had spread out noticeably and had also been joined by a new road running east-west. In Meadowside, a leisure center and housing estate had been built to the north of the original road, while a superstore now stood to the south of the housing estate and the old road.

Presently, the two areas have become one and a large amount of new infrastructure has been built in the empty area that used to lie between the two. A business park has been established to the south of the connecting road, while on the opposite side of the road to this a train station with a line joining the original one has been constructed. Finally, sometime between 1985 and now a hotel was opened just to the north of the railway station.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 67 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferred to as the suburb of Meadowside. In 1962, Meadowside and Fonton were sepa...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n from the southeast to the northwest. Just over two decades later, the two are...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the housing estate and the old road. Presently, the two areas have become one...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63636363636 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55163979815 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494071146245 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.8734907622 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14130607279 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634956366611 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750195173098 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976675114664 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898781957235 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.