The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962

Essay topics:

The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton, a neighboring town , since 1962

The maps provide information on the changes that have happened in two neighboring regions Meadowside village and Fonton town from 1962 to today.
Overall, it can be seen that a dramatic development has made to the transport infrastructure and lots of urban facilities have built in different areas in the period shown. In addition, Fonton and Meadowside village were separated since 1962 until after 1985, when they have merged.
Looking at the instructions on more details, it is clear a residential estate was built in 1985, then it has expanded in the present day. There was also supermarket built to the south-west of the Meadowside. Whereas a park of business was constructed connected the main road by a path. A big hotel was built to the south of the train station.

Turning to the transportation, it shown that in 1962 there were only rough ways in the area which in 1985 improved to be a modern road running through the two areas. A new railway has constructed to the east of the first railway and it goes to the center of the town next to the hotel.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 84 view
2022-03-15 tata 78 view
2022-03-15 tata 67 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lt to the south-west of the Meadowside. Whereas a park of business was constructed conn...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uilt to the south of the train station. Turning to the transportation, it shown ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69518716578 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75991786392 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6487665805 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247421833759 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936112443981 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153244598152 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178250855159 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177868804279 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.