The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012

The map displays the changes that have occurred over a period of 1990 to 2012 in Frenton.
When we see the map we find that west of the town have not been changed drastically, there were only a subtle differences in the place. The houses, shops, park are replaced by flats, supermarket and golf course respectively. In these two decades on Frenton was developed quite a lot, it is the thing we can see clearly. And due to development new apartments have been constructed on the north west side of the town.
Talking about expansion of the place the east side of the high street was a complete shift, people who live there in 90's can not be able to recognize the town now. The hospital got bigger to adjust for the needs of people, trees are converted into technopark, they shut the bank and opened restaurant, as we know new flats were built the old one's got demolished and in the same space a playing field is arranged for children.
Overall, in this 22 years Frenton got dramatic modification of all the buildings and places. Although there is a great development in the place the greenery of the town was lost, all the plantations got destroyed to create room for huge structures. Development is good but not in the cost of giving up of environment.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'difference'?
Suggestion: difference
...d drastically, there were only a subtle differences in the place. The houses, shops, park a...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55752212389 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63929058737 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606194690265 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5838804044 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115899282807 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054782347982 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106125118359 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114109314941 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144522866397 0.0819641961636 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.