Presented are the two maps exhibiting the changes in the layout of the beachfront area in Australia between 1950 and today.
As transparent from the maps, this city has become much more modern and dynamic.
One remarkable modification can be seen is that there are a route was lengthened to connect the city with lighthouse, which is easily accessible for the transportation of citizen and tourists become easier and smoothly. Also, on that road, another modification has been made, the authorities decided to convert the playground into a brand new car park to help the drivers have more place to park their vehicles. Moreover, those dining tables and pavilion next to that are still unchangeable.
Turning into the area which is the nearest to the coast, a restaurant was built to diversify the types of service at the sea front area. Additionally, a pool which is used to just 25m was broadened two time much more than the old one. However, what strikes me is that there are two surf clubs was built. This change is absolutely effective to develop the tourism of the coastal region. A final interesting point has been the unmovable 25m pool and the lighthouse.
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspapers Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government 92
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the picture below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86432160804 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73220844849 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7502763811 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0759506053334 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321005444626 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782553405821 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722673137769 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109329803385 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.