The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first map illustrates how existing Islip town centre and the second indicates the planned development.
Overall, the town centre is predicted that will have more spots. Likewise, some locations will be deleted and replaced in the future.
At present, the space of shops is divided into two parts and designed along the main road similarly. The northern is countryside whereas the south start from main road is housing. Besides the main road, there are two road for vehicle, one is entry to the park as well as one is arrived at school.
On the improvement, a circular carriageway will be designed around the town centre, main road will be demolished as well as replaced by pedestrian’s footpath, the area will open for bus station, shopping centre, car park and shops. A new housing will establish next to the car park as well as the second will place near to the narrowed park. Lastly, there is a convenient road connection between school and park.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-15 | wondertran | 78 | view |
2019-11-30 | prachirai | 73 | view |
2019-11-26 | JiaYanLi | 70 | view |
2019-11-23 | bak1995 | 89 | view |
2019-11-19 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, lastly, likewise, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67693343872 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8080265236 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949711745875 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433618620106 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052655611507 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745790596506 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062525260275 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.