The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two diagrams illustrate the comparison of the center of Islip at its present state and future development projections.

Overall, dual carriageway, new housing, bus station, car park had been planned for future development plans.

As seen in the diagram, dual carriageway is planned to sorround the center of the Islip town in a circular area. In the center of the Islip town, the main road would be utilized for pedestrians only. Bus station, shopping center, car park, new housing would be constructed in northern side of pedestrians road by replacing shops and countryside. However, on the southern side of the pedestrians road, new housing is planned to be constructed near the unchanged park area whereas, old housing would be demolished and shifted in the southwest corner. The school and housing which is located outside portion of dual carriageway would remained untouched in future.

In the present town of Islip, the main road passes through the center of the town in which shops and countryside are located in the northern portion whereas, shops, park, housing and school are located in the southern portion. The two roads are extended to the school and park to connect it to the main road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-30 chathurika2008@gmail.com 67 view
2021-05-30 chathurika2008@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user mangpahang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'remain'
Suggestion: remain
...tside portion of dual carriageway would remained untouched in future. In the present ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...al carriageway would remained untouched in future. In the present town of Islip, the m...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71659713612 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3007190716 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126671178264 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681036057242 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528590050258 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937834122683 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230122582014 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.