The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The two given maps give information about the planned development in a small central town called Islip.
In general, it can be seen that the layout of the town has been significantly changed, with additional features. This area is planned to become an urbanized town for various shops, transport, and especially building a ring road around the center.
Now, Islip has a main road running from the east to the west but in the plan, this road will only cater to pedestrians. The road will expand both on the north and south sides called the dual carriage will create a ring around the center. In the north, they intend to demolish the countryside.
We can see two shops on two sides of the map, one shop in the north will be pulled down to make way for a bus station, a parking lot, a shopping center, and a new house. The size of the park will be reduced so that more houses will be constructed within the ring road. Finally, the school is broadened outside the ring.
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is it a negative or positive development 89
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- It is difficult for people inm the cities to get enough physical exercises What are the reasons What are the solutions 84
- Test 4 Cam 12 The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49152542373 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40496204675 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8598605353 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193275291153 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807532135739 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11085433644 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152087533045 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129626475454 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.